Advocacy workshops at Discover BMB 2024
Discover BMB 2024, the annual meeting of the ͵ÅÄ͵¿ú and ͵ÅÄ͵¿ú Biology, will include workshops hosted by the ASBMB public affairs team and the Public Affairs Advisory Committee on topics such as running for office, becoming an advocate and navigating the grant review process at the National Institutes of Health.
The meeting will take place March 23 – 26, at the Henry B. Gonzales Convention Center in San Antonio, Texas. As you plan your #DiscoverBMB experience, keep these events on your radar.
Beyond instruction: How to support Latinx students
Sunday, March 24, 9 – 10:30 a.m. CT (90 minutes)
This interactive workshop will help faculty learn best practices to support Latinx students and faculty at their institutions. Attendees will examine how these efforts can promote more inclusive learning environments where Latinx students can thrive.
The PAAC and the ASBMB’s Maximizing Access Committee will host this session together with the to explore equity-centered faculty development. The workshop is targeted toward all investigators and instructors as well as administrators who want to learn techniques and gain resources to support a more inclusive learning environment.
Raechel McKinley, the ASBMB’s science policy manager, is among the organizers.
“We want members to gather the skills and resources needed to best support Latinx trainees and scholars,” McKinley said, “and we want them to share what they’ve learned with peers at their home institutions.”
Demystifying NIH’s new review framework
Sunday, March 24, 2 – 3:30 p.m. CT (90 minutes)
, division director for basic and integrative biological sciences in the Center for Scientific Review at the National Institutes of Health, will break down the simplified peer review framework, scoring criterion and the NIH’s timeline for implementation. Attendees will have time to ask questions about the impact of the new framework on grant reviewers and applicants during round table sessions.
The following scientific review officers will participate in the round tables:
- , review branch: Bioengineering, Biodata, and Biomodeling Technologies
- , review branch: ͵ÅÄ͵¿ú and Cellular Sciences and Technologies
- , review branch: Macromolecular Biophysics and Biological Chemistry
- , review branch: ͵ÅÄ͵¿ú Genetics and Genomics
This workshop is aimed at senior and early-career research investigators who want to gain insight and clarity on the new framework. Participating researchers will be able to share the information they gain at the workshop with colleagues at their institutions.
From the bench to the ballot: How to run for office
Monday, March 25, 9 – 10:30 a.m. CT (90 minutes)
Attendees will be guided through an exercise to identify a problem or challenge for their community, match it to the board or policymaking body with the ability to make change and craft a preliminary pitch for this position to take into the community. Attendees will also learn how to support science, technology, engineering and mathematics candidates running across the country.
This workshop is for individuals at all career stages and backgrounds; no prior political experience is required. One of the workshop organizers is ASBMB PAAC member Sarah Smaga, who serves as the scientific conferences coordinator at , an organization that is focused on recruiting, training and electing individuals with a background in science to public office.
Smaga joined the organization after working on cell biologist Valerie Horsley’s 2018 state senate campaign in Connecticut.
“I saw voters’ enthusiasm firsthand,” Smaga said. “They were excited about Valerie’s credentials as a scientist, about her ability to interpret data, and make decisions ... Even though we ultimately lost, I was hooked. Since then, I’ve worked with 314 Action to share the stories of scientists serving in office and inspire others to make the leap.”
Also, check out the ASBMB webinar “From the bench to the ballot: Stories from scientists who have run for office” on Feb. 21 at 2 p.m. ET. Smaga will moderate this event, which will include a panel discussion with biochemists and molecular biologists who have run for and served in elected political office.
Advocacy town hall
Tuesday March 26, 9 – 10:30 a.m. CT (90 minutes)
Learn how the ASBMB public affairs department and members of the PAAC advocate on behalf of ASBMB members with policy makers at federal agencies and on Capitol Hill (Learn more here). During the second half of this event, ASBMB members will have the floor to raise concerns the society can consider for future advocacy work.
The town hall meeting is open to everyone attending #DiscoverBMB.
Ann West associate vice president for research development and a professor at the University of Oklahoma, is chair of the PAAC.
“What we do in terms of our advocacy efforts is entirely on behalf of the ASBMB membership, so we look forward to interacting with and hearing from members at our Town Hall meeting,” West said.
“Future policymakers, especially those who are early career, are encouraged to attend to hear more in-depth about our Advocacy Training Program. They can also learn about the program at the Career Hub on Sunday, March 24, 3 – 3:30 p.m. CT.”
Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreFeatured jobs
from the
Get the latest from ASBMB Today
Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Policy
Policy highlights or most popular articles
Applied research won’t flourish without basic science
Three senior figures at the US National Institutes of Health explain why the agency remains committed to supporting basic science and research.
ASBMB weighs in on NIH reform proposal
The agency must continue to prioritize investigator-initiated, curiosity-driven basic research, society says.
ASBMB seeks feedback on NIH postdoc training questions
The National Institutes of Health takes steps toward addressing concerns about support caps, a funding mechanism and professional development.
5 growing threats to academic freedom
From educational gag orders to the decline of tenure-track positions, academic freedom in the United States has been worsening in recent years.
Will Congress revive the China Initiative?
The 2018 program to counter economic espionage raised fears about anti-Asian discrimination and discouraged researchers.
The sweeping impact of the Supreme Court’s Chevron reversal
Repealing the 40-year-old doctrine throws laws on climate, conservation, health, technology and more into doubt.