͵ÅÄ͵¿ú

For science to be sustainable, all entities involved in the scientific enterprise must be able to recruit, train and retain scientists who can adapt to the evolving needs of the scientific workforce and society. Graduate students and postdocs in biochemistry and molecular biology increasingly express interest in a variety of roles within and beyond academia, and the COVID-19 pandemic has emphasized the value of scientists in diverse roles.

Scientists working in academic and industry labs, in policy and in communications all have made valuable contributions to the fight against SARS-CoV-2. To thrive in their future careers, trainees need to learn both technical and professional skills — from experimental design to written and verbal communication to specific scientific techniques to working in diverse teams.

This vision underlies many of the ͵ÅÄ͵¿ú and ͵ÅÄ͵¿ú Biology’s activities, particularly those related to professional development. However, much remains to be done. Looking across the scientific training landscape, approaches remain disparate, leading to inefficiencies in implementation and lack of systematic change.

Many graduate programs require individual development plans, but not nearly as many offer training on how to create and use these plans effectively. Those programs that offer training have had to develop it themselves without a tried and tested method for peer review or dissemination. This also has been our experience as we work to develop high-quality career and professional development at our own institutions; we find it difficult to identify published best practices and efficiently implement new curricula and training.

These systemic challenges were discussed at the ASBMB’s 2016 Summit on Sustaining the Biomedical Research Enterprise, where participants recommended forming a national hub to offer curated, evidence-based resources to catalyze change in biomedical research training. This idea has come to fruition with the creation of the (pd|hub).

Forming pd|hub

The organizers of pd|hub aim to effect change with input from the full range of stakeholders for graduate and postdoctoral education. A 2019 workshop organized by pd|hub assembled university leaders, career development professionals, scientific societies, publishers of science and education journals, education researchers, employers, funding organizations, professional associations, and trainees to discuss the challenges and opportunities associated with preparing graduate students and postdocs for diverse career paths.

The workshop identified four key challenges to systemic change and five critical actions for advancing evidence-based practices in Ph.D. career and professional development. Read the full report .

Challenges to change

• The need for a trainee-centered perspective in Ph.D. training.
• Undervaluation of Ph.D. career and professional development as a core component of training.
• Misaligned incentive and reward structures for enacting change in graduate and postdoctoral education.
• The need for communication and collaboration among stakeholders across local and national efforts to modernize graduate and postdoctoral education.

Critical actions

• Creating incentives for change at institutions and programs and establishing accountability.
• Curating and disseminating resources for evidence-based career and professional development models in a way that supports widespread implementation.
• Broadening and deepening evidence for effective training and mentoring practices that promote career and professional development.
• Improving communication within and across stakeholders in science, technology, engineering and mathematics Ph.D. education.
• Creating standards and defined expectations for STEM Ph.D. career and professional development.

Taking action

pd|hub is taking several actions.

First, organizers are working to develop peer-reviewed collections of evidence-based practices in graduate/postdoctoral education, specifically in professional skills development. Pd|hub is collecting submissions now, and the first collection will be available in 2022. These collections will be a resource for universities, programs and departments seeking to implement or enhance professional skills training for their graduate students and postdoctoral scholars.

Second, six scientific societies, including the ASBMB, have formed a partnership with pd|hub to share ideas and resources and collaborate on a series of projects. Students, postdocs, educators and mentors face similar challenges across scientific disciplines, so it makes sense to work together to address the challenges and take the critical actions that are described. The group’s current project is a on graduate student mental health in partnership with the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. The group also hosted a in June 2020.

To learn more or get involved, visit .