Crime scene biochemistry at the Capitol
Last week, ͵ÅÄ͵¿ú and ͵ÅÄ͵¿ú Biology committee and staff members participated in the hosted by the and the on Capitol Hill. The purpose of the event was to give members of Congress and their staffers an opportunity to learn about science and scientific advocacy organizations in a hands-on way. The ASBMB was one of 15 invited organizations that participated in the event; others included the , the , the and more.
at the ASBMB booth July 19 at Capitol Hill.
“We wanted to participate in this event to get an audience with congressional staffers,” Sarina Neote, public affairs director of the ASBMB, said. “Their job is to make recommendations on budget increases on programs that need to be supported or programs that need to be cut. Our goal is to convey the importance of basic scientists and how Congress can support us. Then, we hope they inform their boss, whether that's a House rep or senator, what they've learned. Another benefit to making contact with the staffers is that we can establish ourselves as a resource, and a lot of staffers seek out advice from offices like ours on important issues.”
, an ASBMB Science Outreach and Communication Committee member and associate professor of biochemistry at the Catholic University of America, and , an ASBMB Public Affairs Advisory Committee member and a professor of biology at William & Mary, conducted a forensic science immunoassay demonstration.
“We wanted to show the types of experiments that our community members do but connect it to something that we think about in the real world,” Kirsten Block, director of education, professional development and outreach at the ASBMB, said. “We have all seen crime shows, so this demo is an easy way for people to put themselves in the shoes of a forensic scientist doing these experiments. We can use the activity as a talking point about the types of research that our members do and why it is important.”
The color-changing, texture-changing activity simulates a crime scene investigation. Participants use pipettes and an immunoassay to type and identify “blood” samples.
“This event is great because it allows individuals to come in and actually perform an experiment with their own hands and ask questions,” Hinton said. “They can see how the experiment they are performing is used for education. It is a great example of how what scientists do ties into the community.”
The event also gave the ASBMB an opportunity to connect with other advocacy organizations, such as , and undergraduates interested in science.
“It’s important to talk with government officials and staffers because we all have our own bubbles,” Miller said. “Just as my bubble is far away from politics, elected officials’ bubble is pretty far away from biochemistry. So, it's nice to have a space to talk about how our two bubbles actually do overlap.”
Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from ASBMB Today
Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Policy
Policy highlights or most popular articles
Applied research won’t flourish without basic science
Three senior figures at the US National Institutes of Health explain why the agency remains committed to supporting basic science and research.
ASBMB weighs in on NIH reform proposal
The agency must continue to prioritize investigator-initiated, curiosity-driven basic research, society says.
ASBMB seeks feedback on NIH postdoc training questions
The National Institutes of Health takes steps toward addressing concerns about support caps, a funding mechanism and professional development.
5 growing threats to academic freedom
From educational gag orders to the decline of tenure-track positions, academic freedom in the United States has been worsening in recent years.
Will Congress revive the China Initiative?
The 2018 program to counter economic espionage raised fears about anti-Asian discrimination and discouraged researchers.
The sweeping impact of the Supreme Court’s Chevron reversal
Repealing the 40-year-old doctrine throws laws on climate, conservation, health, technology and more into doubt.