Support for women in BMB
The ͵͵ and ͵͵ Biology has launched the Women in Biochemistry and ͵͵ Biology Committee, or WIBMB. The charge of this newest ASBMB committee is to advocate for women in these disciplines, both in academia and in industry.
Founding members of Yale University, of the National Institutes of Health and of Boston University said the inspiration for the committee arose from the widely reported dearth of women in senior roles in academia and from the community’s enthusiasm for the Women Scientists’ Mentoring and Networking event held at ASBMB annual meetings since 2008.
Baserga said working on the was a further inspiration. The PAAC anti-harassment working group, chaired by of the University of Southern California, has been working for about a year to promote policies to address sexual harassment and gender discrimination in science.
Members organized a congressional briefing in December 2018 to share findings by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine that such harassment is widespread, and they have continued to pursue solutions in conversation with science funding institutes and policymakers.
According to Baserga, the working group catalyzed a cadre of “mighty women” in the PAAC. “I was so motivated by their collective wisdom, their generosity and smarts, that I thought we could offer that to the wider ASBMB,” she said, adding that past ASBMB president was a key champion of the proposal.
The formation of the women’s committee was announced during this year’s Women Scientists’ Networking Dinner at the ASBMB annual meeting in Orlando. “I was so impressed with the energy in the room,” Baserga said.
The committee plans to come together with the community annually at that dinner during the ASBMB meeting. The event will include talks on issues that uniquely challenge women scientists and will continue to serve as a forum for sharing experiences, challenges and solutions.Beginning in 2020, two new awards recognizing individuals with a strong commitment to advancing the careers of women in biochemistry and molecular biology will be presented at the dinner: one for early-career faculty and one for more established scientists. Nominations for these awards will open in the fall.
“I am delighted that the ASBMB Council approved the creation of the Women in Biochemistry and ͵͵ Biology Committee … to highlight the many important roles that women in biochemistry and molecular biology play in advancing our field,” ASBMB president said. “We hope that this committee will formally lead to increased involvement of women in the leadership of ASBMB as well as increase the numbers of outstanding women who are offered high-profile speaking opportunities at ASBMB-sponsored events.”
Want to join?
If you are interested in joining the WIBMB, send your CV/résumé and a short letter of interest to ASBMB Executive Director Barbara Gordon.
Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from ASBMB Today
Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Policy
Policy highlights or most popular articles
Applied research won’t flourish without basic science
Three senior figures at the US National Institutes of Health explain why the agency remains committed to supporting basic science and research.
ASBMB weighs in on NIH reform proposal
The agency must continue to prioritize investigator-initiated, curiosity-driven basic research, society says.
ASBMB seeks feedback on NIH postdoc training questions
The National Institutes of Health takes steps toward addressing concerns about support caps, a funding mechanism and professional development.
5 growing threats to academic freedom
From educational gag orders to the decline of tenure-track positions, academic freedom in the United States has been worsening in recent years.
Will Congress revive the China Initiative?
The 2018 program to counter economic espionage raised fears about anti-Asian discrimination and discouraged researchers.
The sweeping impact of the Supreme Court’s Chevron reversal
Repealing the 40-year-old doctrine throws laws on climate, conservation, health, technology and more into doubt.