A call to action: Urge Congress to support scientific research
The ͵ÅÄ͵¿ú and ͵ÅÄ͵¿ú Biology public affairs team and the society's Public Affairs Advisory Committee advocate for robust budgets for the key science agencies that fund ASBMB members: the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy. We often ask ASBMB members to reach out individually by writing to their elected officials — and we’re doing that now. We’re asking all members to to ask for continued funding.
But what do letter-writing campaigns really accomplish?
Congress needs to hear from ASBMB members
Each congressional office on Capitol Hill depends on its constituents, the senator or representative’s voters, to inform decisions and votes on legislation — including budgets. But often legislators are balancing other priorities. This year, for example, House Republicans are focused on cutting federal spending. One of their targets is NIH funding.
The House of Representatives has budget; this would have a negative impact on the federally funded researchers that the NIH supports. The Senate proposes ; which would allow the NIH to continue funding the work it has already committed to. The ASBMB is urging Congress to either increase or sustain the NIH’s budget; that’s key to continued support for scientists, including ASBMB members.
Members of Congress listen to their voters. The more they hear about the importance of federal funding for scientific research, the more likely they are to maintain or increase the NIH budget instead of cutting it.
That’s why this week we’re calling for their elected policymakers to highlight and emphasize the importance of funding the NIH. (It’s easy to participate; just click on the link and fill out the form. The body of the email is written already.) Congress is currently debating the two proposed budgets for the NIH, and lawmakers must hear directly from scientists about where that money goes and how it supports research across the country.
Ann West, chair of the ASBMB PAAC, stressed the importance of this campaign. “It is imperative that our elected officials hear from those of us in the trenches how devastating cuts to the NIH budget would be,” she said, “especially the resulting reduction in workforce and negative impact on our current and next generation of scientists.”
The Rally for Medical Research
We’ve scheduled this letter-writing effort in conjunction with the , a national call to action to increase the NIH budget organized by the American Association for Cancer Research. More than 350 national organizations and institutions support this event, including the ASBMB.
Health and science policy advocates are meeting with lawmakers and their staffs in congressional offices in Washington, D.C., this week to communicate the importance of the NIH and the work the agency funds. This effort, in particular, will raise awareness about the critical need for robust, sustained and predictable funding increases for the NIH in fiscal year 2024.
“Federal funding, particularly from the NIH, is the lifeblood of academic biomedical researchers,” West said.
You can read more about the .
Enjoy reading ASBMB Today?
Become a member to receive the print edition four times a year and the digital edition weekly.
Learn moreGet the latest from ASBMB Today
Enter your email address, and we’ll send you a weekly email with recent articles, interviews and more.
Latest in Policy
Policy highlights or most popular articles
Applied research won’t flourish without basic science
Three senior figures at the US National Institutes of Health explain why the agency remains committed to supporting basic science and research.
ASBMB weighs in on NIH reform proposal
The agency must continue to prioritize investigator-initiated, curiosity-driven basic research, society says.
ASBMB seeks feedback on NIH postdoc training questions
The National Institutes of Health takes steps toward addressing concerns about support caps, a funding mechanism and professional development.
5 growing threats to academic freedom
From educational gag orders to the decline of tenure-track positions, academic freedom in the United States has been worsening in recent years.
Will Congress revive the China Initiative?
The 2018 program to counter economic espionage raised fears about anti-Asian discrimination and discouraged researchers.
The sweeping impact of the Supreme Court’s Chevron reversal
Repealing the 40-year-old doctrine throws laws on climate, conservation, health, technology and more into doubt.